
Health Care Council |
|||||||
|
Senator Proposes Government-run State Health Plan Saying that the state's hit-or-miss system of providing health care "can't be fixed by half-measures," Sen. Sheila Kuehl has proposed a single, government-run health plan that would cover every man, woman and child in California. It coud be done, she said, without spending a dollar more on health care. "We don't have to spend more money," said Kuehl, D-Santa Monica. " We simply have to cut administrative costs and spend our money differently. If we do, wecan cover every Californian." Kuehl's vision is to provide comprehensive medical, dental, vision and mental health care, including prescription drug coverage. Private health insurance would be eliminated, and the state-run program would be paid for through a tax on wages of about three percent and a tax on business payrolls of about six percent. Federal and state tax money that now goes to Medicare and MediCal would instead be put into the single state fund. Since no one would be paying private health insurance premiums, co-payments for medical services or insurance deductibles, Kuehl said, most companies and individuals would end up paying about the same or less for health insurance as they now do. There would be enough left over in the state fund, she said, to also cover the estimated 7.3 million Californians who are now uninsured. Kuehl's proposal is the most radical of three universal-health measures that have been put forth in the legislature this year. The others would maintain the existing system in which most people get private health insurance - through their employers, Medicare coverage for retirees and MediCal for the poor. The idea of a government-run insurance program is vigorously opposed by the health insurance industry and has traditionally been opposed by most health care providers and business groups. "I think its chances of becoming law are very near to zero," said William Wehrle, a lobbyist for the California Association of Health Plans. "I don't think there's anywhere near a consensus to take such a radical step." Wehrle called the argument that universal health care could be provided simply by eliminating administrative costs "a golden oldie" that has not proven to be the case in Canada and Western European countries in which single payer systems have been implemented. "The problem is that there is always a temptation to over-promise," Wehrle said. "If you take away all cost-sharing, then every one of us wants for ourselves and our loved ones the most expensive drugs and the most expensive treatments...Everybody wants something when it's free." Assemblyman Keith Richman, R-Northridge, the only physician in the legislature, said that while he supports universal health insurance he is opposed to a single payer system. (Downloaded from the internet, this article appeared in the Ventura County Star, February 25, 2003) WOMEN'S HEALTH
COPYRIGHT © 2000-02 Health Care Council of Orange County
|
|||||||